Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
70 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Updated by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Announced May 2010
- Other Name is WB5500
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-4 was unveiled 5 years later than the HZ50W and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the TG-4 matches up against the HZ50W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Samsung HZ50W. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Samsung HZ50W
| TG-4 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | April 2015 |  | May 2010 | More recent by 61 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus TG-4
| HZ50W | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Samsung HZ50W
| TG-4 | HZ50W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 has got outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-4 compared to the HZ50W.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and HZ50W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-4 and HZ50W.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-4 to deliver more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The younger TG-4 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-4 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung HZ50W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Samsung HZ50W |
| Also Known as | - | WB5500 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2015-04-13 | 2010-05-03 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 426 gr (0.94 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $379 | $250 |