Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD10
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- New Model is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Raise to 1600)
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched March 2004
- Previous Model is Sigma SD9
- Refreshed by Sigma SD14
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD10, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-4 was revealed 11 years after the SD10 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TG-4 matches up vs the SD10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Sigma SD10. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sigma SD10
| TG-4 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | March 2004 | Newer by 135 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 130k | Crisper display (+330k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Olympus TG-4
| SD10 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sigma SD10
| TG-4 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 features exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD10 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-4 compared to the SD10.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and SD10 is 90 and 54 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and SD10.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus TG-4 will provide extra detail because of its extra 13MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The younger TG-4 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-4 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sigma SD10 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 3 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 1.8" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 130k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 950g (2.09 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $379 | $198 |