Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H20
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H20 Key Specs
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Sony H20
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Released May 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H20 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H20, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and H20 (10MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-4 was released 6 years after the H20 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-4 scores against the H20 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H20 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony H20
| TG-4 | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | May 2009 | Newer by 72 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Olympus TG-4
| H20 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony H20
| TG-4 | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 offers exterior measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony H20 has dimensions of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H20 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-4 compared to the H20.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and H20 is 90 and 87 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The pic below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and H20.
All in all, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-4 to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer TG-4 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography factors
Sony H20 Portrait photography factors
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Street photography camera
Sony H20 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
fixed screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors in class (247 grams)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
more heavy than competition (250 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography factors
Sony H20 Sports photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
weather sealing
great battery life (380 CIPA)
slow fps (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Travel photography camera
Sony H20 as a Travel photography camera
great battery life (380 CIPA)
weather sealing
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competitors in class (247g)
screen is not selfie friendly
built-in flash
very long reach (380mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (250 grams)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony H20 as a Landscape photography camera
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
great battery life (380 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not available
sensor is small (1/2.3")
you can focus manually
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging info
Sony H20 Vlogging info
pretty wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone support
more heavy than competitors in class (247 grams)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (250 grams)
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony H20 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2015-04-13 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 2cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 7.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 250 gr (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $379 | $249 |