Olympus TG-4 vs Sony S950
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony S950 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Video
- 33-132mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 93 x 56 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-4 vs Sony S950 Overview
The following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony S950, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and S950 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-4 was released 6 years after the S950 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the TG-4 matches up versus the S950 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-4 vs Sony S950 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Sony S950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony S950
| TG-4 | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 75 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S950 over the Olympus TG-4
| S950 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony S950
| TG-4 | S950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony S950 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 has got external measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony S950 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony S950 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-4 and the S950.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and S950 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony S950 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and S950.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-4 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern TG-4 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony S950 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony S950 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S950 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2015-04-13 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 93 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $379 | $130 |