Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- Renewed by Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The TG-5 was announced 5 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TG-5 matches up against the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus VR-320
TG-5 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 71 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-5
VR-320 | TG-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Olympus VR-320
TG-5 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-5 has got outer dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-5 against the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a223/4a2239a052730dd5fd19a8f394448b50566ae411" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-5 and VR-320 is 90 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16ba4/16ba478eb4a1021ab18fbf030e46f022ce8e64ed" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-5 and VR-320.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus VR-320 to show extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern TG-5 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efe87/efe876a649658f0d13b1794f76791ef3903ffe41" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf586/bf586b6157526abd608809894e8ae13ca33e5977" alt="Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-5 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-5 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Olympus VR-320 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2017-05-17 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 250 gr (0.55 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $449 | $179 |