Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic LF1
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
37 Features
55 Overall
44
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic LF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2017
- Replaced the Olympus TG-4
- New Model is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-200mm (F2.0-5.9) lens
- 192g - 103 x 62 x 28mm
- Announced November 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic LF1 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic LF1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-5 (12MP) and the LF1 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the TG-5 (1/2.3") and LF1 (1/1.7") have totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-5 was announced 3 years after the LF1 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the TG-5 matches up versus the LF1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic LF1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-5 Gallery & Panasonic LF1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Panasonic LF1
| TG-5 | LF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 | November 2013 | More modern by 43 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic LF1 over the Olympus TG-5
| LF1 | TG-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Panasonic LF1
| TG-5 | LF1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic LF1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-5 has outside dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) while the Panasonic LF1 has sizing of 103mm x 62mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic LF1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the TG-5 versus the LF1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-5 and LF1 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic LF1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-5 and LF1.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The TG-5 comes with the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging. The fresher TG-5 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic LF1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-5 vs Panasonic LF1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2017-05-17 | 2013-11-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 7.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 250g (0.55 pounds) | 192g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 103 x 62 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 52 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 211 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 pictures | 250 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $449 | $500 |