Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-4
- New Model is Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-5 versus Ricoh WG-4, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-5 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-5 was introduced 3 years later than the WG-4 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the TG-5 grades against the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-5 and Ricoh WG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-5 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Ricoh WG-4
TG-5 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | February 2014 | Fresher by 40 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus TG-5
WG-4 | TG-5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Ricoh WG-4
TG-5 | WG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-5 offers exterior dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-5 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-5 vs the WG-4.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-5 and WG-4 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over technical specs. The photograph below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-5 and WG-4.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 to deliver extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent TG-5 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh WG-4 |
Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Announced | 2017-05-17 | 2014-02-05 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 250 gr (0.55 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | 240 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $449 | $330 |