Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2017
- Older Model is Olympus TG-4
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-6
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- New Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-5 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-5 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-5 was revealed 3 years after the WG-4 GPS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the TG-5 matches up vs the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-5 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-5 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| TG-5 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2017 |  | February 2014 | More modern by 40 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus TG-5
| WG-4 GPS | TG-5 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-5 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| TG-5 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-5 features external measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-5 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-5 against the WG-4 GPS.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-5 and WG-4 GPS is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The pic here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-5 and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to give more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent TG-5 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-5 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
focusing manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
features face detection focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-5 Street photography details
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography details
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors (250 grams)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than others (235g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-5 Sports photography details
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography details
high frames per second (20.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
environment sealing
good battery life (340 per charge)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
weather proof
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low battery life (240 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-5 Travel photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography advice
good battery life (340 shots)
environment sealing
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competitors (250g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
weather proof
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
low battery life (240 CIPA)
more heavy than others (235g)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-5 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Landscape photography camera
focusing manually
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
good battery life (340 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
focusing manually
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
weather proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
low battery life (240 CIPA)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-5 Vlogging advice
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging advice
quite wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not posses selfie friendly display
no external microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (250 grams)
pretty wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external microphone socket
more heavy than others (235g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-5 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-5 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2017-05-17 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 250 gr (0.55 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $449 | $210 |