Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic ZS200
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
86 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Announced May 2019
- Superseded the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Other Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus TG-6 versus Panasonic ZS200, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the TG-6 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the TG-6 (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") offer different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-6 was brought out 16 months after the ZS200 which makes them a generation away from one another. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-6 matches up against the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Panasonic ZS200
TG-6 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2019 | February 2018 | More modern by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-6
ZS200 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1240k | 1040k | Clearer screen (+200k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Panasonic ZS200
TG-6 | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-6 has got outside dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-6 versus Panasonic ZS200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-6 against the ZS200.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-6 and ZS200 is 90 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-6 and ZS200.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-6 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Panasonic ZS200 will show greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent TG-6 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-6 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-6 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2019-05-22 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 253 grams (0.56 pounds) | 340 grams (0.75 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 images | 370 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $449 | $800 |