Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffd7f/ffd7f68f44b62cc6692afbe8663d94e19abfcd45" alt="Olympus Tough TG-6 front Olympus Tough TG-6 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- New Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-6 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is relatively close but the TG-6 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The TG-6 was revealed 9 years later than the GR Digital III and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the TG-6 scores versus the GR Digital III for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-6 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2019 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 120 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus TG-6
GR Digital III | TG-6 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Ricoh GR Digital III
TG-6 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-6 enjoys exterior measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has sizing of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-6 and the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb7a3/bb7a3d1401152ec968c693b54fa2efb20230ecae" alt="Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-6 and GR Digital III is 90 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3acf6/3acf6eada2a921802b7cc1a05310ed5a8ea6872d" alt="Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-6 and GR Digital III.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-6 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus TG-6 will render more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent TG-6 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13524/13524ae304edf6f73bdbca3e06ca46e5764a729c" alt="Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39e2f/39e2fdc85db1023d338e6fbff6e2547907eb0820" alt="Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-6 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2019-05-22 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 253 grams (0.56 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 pictures | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $449 | $399 |