Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sigma DP3 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
57
Features
33
Overall
47

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Sigma DP3 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 75mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Released January 2013
  • Older Model is Sigma DP2 Merrill
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview

Here is a extensive overview of the Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill, both Large Sensor Compact cameras and both of them are designed by Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and DP3 Merrill (15MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (APS-C).

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The DP2 Quattro was released 14 months later than the DP3 Merrill which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Large Sensor Compact).

Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the DP2 Quattro grades versus the DP3 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sigma DP3 Merrill

 DP2 Quattro DP3 Merrill 
ReleasedFebruary 2014January 2013Fresher by 14 months

Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 DP3 Merrill DP2 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sigma DP3 Merrill

 DP2 Quattro DP3 Merrill 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Screen resolution920k920kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Sigma DP2 Quattro offers exterior dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Sigma DP3 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Check out the Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the DP2 Quattro compared to the DP3 Merrill.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the DP2 Quattro and DP3 Merrill is 70 and 83 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the DP2 Quattro and DP3 Merrill.

As you can see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Sigma DP2 Quattro to show more detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer DP2 Quattro should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography info
Sigma DP3 Merrill Portrait photography info
77
has manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
74
has manual focus
decent megapixels (15MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography features
Sigma DP3 Merrill Street photography features
61
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
65
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP3 Merrill as a Sports photography camera
48
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
45
decent megapixels (15 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
fixed focal length (75mm)
low fps (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography highlights
Sigma DP3 Merrill Travel photography highlights
53
good MP (20MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
54
decent megapixels (15MP)
does not have Timelapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
Landscape photography with Sigma DP3 Merrill
59
has manual focus
screen size is good (3")
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
56
has manual focus
decent sized screen (3")
decent megapixels (15 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (75mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging details
Sigma DP3 Merrill Vlogging details
9
can't record video
22
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have microphone socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sigma DP3 Merrill
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSigma DP3 Merrill
General Information
Brand Name Sigma Sigma
Model type Sigma DP2 Quattro Sigma DP3 Merrill
Category Large Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2014-02-13 2013-01-08
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TRUE III engine Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 15 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 5424 x 3616 4704 x 3136
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 45mm (1x) 75mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds -
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options no built-in flash no built-in flash
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 395g (0.87 lbs) 330g (0.73 lbs)
Dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP-51 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) -
Time lapse feature
Card slots One One
Launch cost $931 $1,353