Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2019
- Superseded the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-6 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-6 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is relatively close but the TG-6 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-6 was unveiled 9 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the TG-6 grades vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-6 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-6 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TG-6 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2019 | November 2009 | More recent by 116 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus TG-6
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | TG-6 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
TG-6 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-6 has exterior dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-6 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-6 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-6 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 90 and 77 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-6 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor measurements. The TG-6 uses the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF harder. The more modern TG-6 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-6 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-05-22 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 253g (0.56 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 shots | 320 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $449 | $566 |