Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-80
90 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Revealed May 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Olympus TG-6 versus Ricoh WG-80, both Waterproof cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the TG-6 (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-6 was announced 4 years before the WG-80 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the TG-6 grades vs the WG-80 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-6 & Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-6 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Ricoh WG-80
| TG-6 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus TG-6
| WG-80 | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 | May 2019 | More modern by 36 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Ricoh WG-80
| TG-6 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-6 features outer dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-6 versus Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the TG-6 against the WG-80.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-6 and WG-80 is 90 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-6 and WG-80.
As you can see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-80 to provide you with more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged TG-6 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-6 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2019-05-22 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.70 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 20.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 253g (0.56 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $449 | $300 |