Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB750
Portability
90 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
90 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Portability
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
Olympus TG-6
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2019
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-5
Samsung WB750
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Revealed September 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-6 versus Samsung WB750, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-6 (12MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-6 was launched 7 years after the WB750 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the TG-6 matches up vs the WB750 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-6 & Samsung WB750. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-6 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Samsung WB750
| TG-6 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2019 |  | September 2011 | More modern by 94 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Olympus TG-6
| WB750 | TG-6 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-6 and Samsung WB750
| TG-6 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-6 offers external dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-6 versus Samsung WB750 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-6 vs the WB750.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-6 and WB750 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The picture here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-6 and WB750.
All in all, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB750 to offer more detail utilizing its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher TG-6 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-6
Portrait photography with Samsung WB750
focusing manually
offers face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
focusing manually
good megapixels (13 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus TG-6
Street photography with Samsung WB750
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (253 grams)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (193g)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-6 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB750 as a Sports photography camera
high max frames per second (20.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
good battery (340 shots)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
excellent zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (13 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-6 Travel photography features
Samsung WB750 Travel photography features
good battery (340 per charge)
environment proof
flash built-in
rather wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competition (253g)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
lighter than competitors in class (193 grams)
good megapixels (13MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (432mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-6 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB750 Landscape photography info
focusing manually
rather wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
good battery (340 CIPA)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (13 megapixels)
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-6 Vlogging factors
Samsung WB750 Vlogging factors
rather wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have mic socket
heavier than competition (253g)
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competitors in class (193g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-6 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-6 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-6 | Samsung WB750 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2019-05-22 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 253g (0.56 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $449 | $339 |