Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly similar but the VG-110 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VG-110 was manufactured about the same time to the XZ-1 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the VG-110 scores vs the XZ-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 & Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus XZ-1
| VG-110 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus VG-110
| XZ-1 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Olympus XZ-1
| VG-110 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2011 | January 2011 | Similar age | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VG-110 has exterior measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the VG-110 compared to the XZ-1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and XZ-1 is 97 and 88 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-110 and XZ-1.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VG-110 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus VG-110 will offer more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus VG-110 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 105g (0.23 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 photos | 320 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $567 |