Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is fairly similar but the VG-110 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-110 was manufactured about the same time to the XZ-1 and they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the VG-110 scores vs the XZ-1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 & Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus XZ-1
| VG-110 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus VG-110
| XZ-1 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Olympus XZ-1
| VG-110 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2011 |  | January 2011 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VG-110 has exterior measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the VG-110 compared to the XZ-1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and XZ-1 is 97 and 88 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The pic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-110 and XZ-1.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VG-110 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus VG-110 will offer more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VG-110 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus VG-110 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-02-08 | 2011-01-26 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 105g (0.23 pounds) | 275g (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 photos | 320 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $150 | $567 |