Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
93 Imaging
31 Features
30 Overall
30
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus VG-110 versus Ricoh CX1, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VG-110 was revealed 24 months after the CX1 making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the VG-110 scores versus the CX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 & Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh CX1
| VG-110 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2011 | February 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus VG-110
| CX1 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh CX1
| VG-110 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus VG-110 has got external dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-110 versus Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the VG-110 versus the CX1.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and CX1 is 97 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The image underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-110 and CX1.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-110 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher VG-110 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 105 grams (0.23 lb) | 180 grams (0.40 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $150 | $299 |