Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus VG-110 versus Ricoh CX1, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VG-110 was revealed 24 months after the CX1 making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the VG-110 scores versus the CX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-110 & Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh CX1
VG-110 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | February 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus VG-110
CX1 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh CX1
VG-110 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus VG-110 has got external dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VG-110 versus Ricoh CX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the VG-110 versus the CX1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and CX1 is 97 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specifications. The image underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-110 and CX1.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-110 to resolve greater detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher VG-110 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh CX1 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2011-02-08 | 2009-02-19 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 105 grams (0.23 lb) | 180 grams (0.40 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-70B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $150 | $299 |