Clicky

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus VG-110 front
 
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front
Portability
88
Imaging
53
Features
37
Overall
46

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs

Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Introduced February 2011
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28mm (F2.5) lens
  • 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
  • Revealed September 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview

Below is a extensive review of the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is relatively comparable but the VG-110 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The VG-110 was announced 5 months later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the VG-110 grades against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 VG-110 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus VG-110

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 VG-110 
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 VG-110 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
RevealedFebruary 2011September 2010Same generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-110 features external measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has proportions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).

Check the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the VG-110 against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 97 and 88 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by going through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

As you can see, each of these cameras have got the exact same MP albeit different sensor measurements. The VG-110 includes the smaller sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field more challenging.

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-110 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 as a Portrait photography camera
26
offers face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
58
has manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
low MP (12MP)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Street photography advice
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Street photography advice
48
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
70
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than average in class (140 grams)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Sports photography advice
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sports photography advice
24
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (170 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
32
sensor size is good (APS-C)
can't change focal length (28mm)
no liveview feature
slow frames per second (5.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery power (320 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-110 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 as a Travel photography camera
57
has built in flash
rather wide (27mm)
missing Timelapse mode
bad battery power (170 shots)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
59
lighter than average in class (140g)
has built in flash
not so great battery power (320 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography details
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Landscape photography details
27
rather wide (27mm)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
bad battery power (170 per charge)
missing Timelapse mode
48
has manual focus
nice screen size (3 inches)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
not so great battery power (320 per charge)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VG-110
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
28
rather wide (27mm)
offers face detect autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
missing microphone jack
28
offers face detection focusing
lighter than average in class (140g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
 Olympus VG-110Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VG-110 Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
Type Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2011-02-08 2010-09-21
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III GR Engine III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.5
Macro focus range 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT Color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 180s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/3200s
Continuous shooting speed - 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4 MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 105g (0.23 pounds) 140g (0.31 pounds)
Dimensions 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 170 photos 320 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-70B DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $150 $566