Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-30
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-30, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VG-110 was introduced 4 years prior to the WG-30 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summation of how the VG-110 matches up vs the WG-30 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-110 & Ricoh WG-30. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Ricoh WG-30
VG-110 | WG-30 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus VG-110
WG-30 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2014 | February 2011 | Fresher by 44 months |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Ricoh WG-30
VG-110 | WG-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VG-110 offers exterior dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the VG-110 vs the WG-30.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-110 and WG-30 is 97 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-110 and WG-30.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-30 to offer extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older VG-110 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-110 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Ricoh WG-30 |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-02-08 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) | 192 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photographs | 300 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $150 | $428 |