Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB350F
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29


90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Launched January 2014

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB350F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The VG-110 was manufactured 3 years before the WB350F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the VG-110 scores against the WB350F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-110 and Samsung WB350F. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-110 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Samsung WB350F
VG-110 | WB350F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus VG-110
WB350F | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 35 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Samsung WB350F
VG-110 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-110 enjoys exterior measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB350F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the VG-110 compared to the WB350F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-110 and WB350F is 97 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and WB350F.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Samsung WB350F to render more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older VG-110 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus VG-110 | Samsung WB350F |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-02-08 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 105g (0.23 lb) | 276g (0.61 lb) |
Dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-70B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $150 | $260 |