Clicky

Olympus VG-110 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus VG-110 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus VG-110 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Released February 2011
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VG-110 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus VG-110 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the VG-110 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The VG-110 was announced 4 years earlier than the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving into a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the VG-110 grades vs the DP2 Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 VG-110 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus VG-110

 DP2 Quattro VG-110 
IntroducedFebruary 2014February 2011More modern by 36 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 VG-110 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Olympus VG-110 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-110 comes with exterior measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VG-110 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the VG-110 versus the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus VG-110 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and DP2 Quattro is 97 and 70 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-110 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can see, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VG-110 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will produce more detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged VG-110 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus VG-110 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-110 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-110 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
26
includes face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
77
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection focus
supports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Street photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography details
48
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
61
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Sports photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography info
24
includes tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (170 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
47
megapixel count decent (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Travel photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography info
57
flash built-in
reasonably wide (27mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (170 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
53
megapixel count decent (20MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography information
27
reasonably wide (27mm)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery pack (170 shots)
does not have Timelapse recording
59
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Vlogging factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging factors
28
reasonably wide (27mm)
includes face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external microphone port
9
lack of video recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VG-110 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-110 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus VG-110Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Make Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus VG-110 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2011-02-08 2014-02-13
Body design Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8
Macro focus range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT Color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format MPEG-4 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 105 gr (0.23 lbs) 395 gr (0.87 lbs)
Physical dimensions 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 170 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-70B BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $150 $931