Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28610/28610d92a1bc9db50c39d8fc3686aeec0604eb40" alt="Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Updated by Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus VG-110 versus Sony A200, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the VG-110 (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is very comparable but the VG-110 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The VG-110 was released 2 years later than the A200 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the VG-110 matches up versus the A200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-110 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VG-110 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Sony A200
VG-110 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | July 2008 | More recent by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus VG-110
A200 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Sony A200
VG-110 | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal display sizing |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-110 comes with external measurements of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) while the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-110 versus Sony A200 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the VG-110 against the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f61c/3f61c5b5ab1bc64be4cf64d1592a3e0f1bb5660a" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 size comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VG-110 and A200 is 97 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44691/446917b5dade42494884913ad3b7c9d9ef1f432b" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-110 and A200.
As you can see, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VG-110 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Olympus VG-110 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger VG-110 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/306c5/306c5be6776a19711bf9b0f8440ba0402714e01b" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89884/898846ad179c2a4855d8628678435af7f528c3c8" alt="Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A200 Specifications
Olympus VG-110 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VG-110 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2011-02-08 | 2008-07-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 105 grams (0.23 pounds) | 572 grams (1.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 170 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | Compact Flash |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $150 | $100 |