Clicky

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony QX1

Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus VG-110 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Introduced February 2011
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony QX1 Overview

Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus VG-110 versus Sony QX1, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Lens-style by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the VG-110 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The VG-110 was revealed 4 years prior to the QX1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the VG-110 grades versus the QX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Sony QX1

 VG-110 QX1 
Display size2.7""Larger display (+2.7")
Display resolution230k0kCrisper display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus VG-110

 QX1 VG-110 
AnnouncedSeptember 2014February 2011More modern by 43 months
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Sony QX1

 VG-110 QX1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-110 comes with physical dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Examine the Olympus VG-110 versus Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the VG-110 and the QX1.

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-110 and QX1 is 97 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The pic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-110 and QX1.

All in all, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VG-110 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony QX1 will give you more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged VG-110 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Portrait photography info
Sony QX1 Portrait photography info
26
comes with face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
low MP (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
66
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
no manual control
can't use external flash
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Street photography info
Sony QX1 Street photography info
48
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
69
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
offers focus by touch
no moving screen
no image stabilization
more heavy than others (216 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VG-110
Sports photography with Sony QX1
24
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
not so great battery life (170 shots)
has no phase detect autofocus
56
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
great battery pack (440 per charge)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Travel photography features
Sony QX1 Travel photography features
57
has built in flash
decently wide (27mm)
no Timelapse recording
not so great battery life (170 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.9)
71
great battery pack (440 per charge)
offers focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
more heavy than others (216g)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VG-110
Landscape photography with Sony QX1
27
decently wide (27mm)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.9)
small screen (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
not so great battery life (170 shots)
no Timelapse recording
64
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
great battery pack (440 per charge)
small screen ( inch)
no manual control
no image stabilization
no Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VG-110
Vlogging with Sony QX1
28
decently wide (27mm)
comes with face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.9)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
no external microphone support
32
has touchscreen
comes with face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
no microphone jack
more heavy than others (216g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-110 and Sony QX1
 Olympus VG-110Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VG-110 Sony Alpha QX1
Type Ultracompact Lens-style
Introduced 2011-02-08 2014-09-03
Body design Ultracompact Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III Bionz X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 5456 x 3632
Maximum native ISO 1600 16000
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.6
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" -
Resolution of screen 230k dot 0k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4 MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 105g (0.23 lbs) 216g (0.48 lbs)
Physical dimensions 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 170 shots 440 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-70B NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $150 $500