Clicky

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300

Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
20
Overall
29
Olympus VG-110 front
 
Sony Alpha a6300 front
Portability
83
Imaging
67
Features
82
Overall
73

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs

Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Released February 2011
Sony A6300
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
  • Announced February 2016
  • Old Model is Sony A6000
  • Replacement is Sony A6500
Photography Glossary

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300 Overview

Following is a extended comparison of the Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the VG-110 (12MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the VG-110 (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The VG-110 was introduced 6 years earlier than the A6300 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the VG-110 scores versus the A6300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Sony A6300

 VG-110 A6300 

Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus VG-110

 A6300 VG-110 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016February 2011More modern by 60 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kSharper screen (+692k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-110 and Sony A6300

 VG-110 A6300 
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-110 has physical dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has proportions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).

See the Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the VG-110 and the A6300.

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-110 and A6300 is 97 and 83 respectively.

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specs. The pic below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-110 and A6300.

All in all, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VG-110 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A6300 will deliver more detail using its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged VG-110 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Portrait photography details
Sony A6300 Portrait photography details
27
supports face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
80
you can focus manually
MP count good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Street photography information
Sony A6300 Street photography information
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
79
tilting screen
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
above average ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VG-110
Sports photography with Sony A6300
25
supports tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery (170 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
75
MP count good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
environment sealing
comes with phase detect autofocus
lack of image stabilization
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Travel photography factors
Sony A6300 Travel photography factors
57
flash built-in
decently wide (27mm)
no Time Lapse function
low battery (170 shots)
megapixel count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
76
environment sealing
MP count good (24MP)
flash built-in
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VG-110
Landscape photography with Sony A6300
28
decently wide (27mm)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
low battery (170 shots)
no Time Lapse function
79
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
MP count good (24MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-110 Vlogging advice
Sony A6300 Vlogging advice
28
decently wide (27mm)
supports face detection autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.9)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
no external mic support
35
offers face detect autofocus
good video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does have mic socket
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VG-110 vs Sony A6300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-110 and Sony A6300
 Olympus VG-110Sony Alpha a6300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VG-110 Sony Alpha a6300
Category Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2011-02-08 2016-02-03
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III BIONZ X
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 24MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Highest boosted ISO - 51200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 425
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 27-108mm (4.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Total lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 11.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 105 gr (0.23 lb) 404 gr (0.89 lb)
Physical dimensions 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 85
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1437
Other
Battery life 170 photos 400 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-70B NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature With downloadable app
Storage type SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $150 $889