Olympus VG-120 vs Samsung ST700: An Ultracompact Camera Showdown for Your Creative Journey

In the world of ultracompact cameras, functionality, portability, and image quality must coexist in a tiny package. The Olympus VG-120 and Samsung ST700 - both launched within days of each other in early 2011 - are intriguing contenders in this segment. Each promises ease of use and decent image results for casual and enthusiast photographers looking for a grab-and-go companion.

But, which one deserves your attention in 2024? We've extensively tested these models to provide you an honest, detailed comparison. By evaluating their technical specifications, real-world performance, and suitability across multiple photography disciplines, we’ll help you choose the camera that best fits your creative ambitions and shooting style.

Let’s dive into the practical differences, and see where each camera shines (and where they fall short)!

Getting a Feel for Size and Handling: Ergonomics Under the Microscope

When carrying an ultracompact camera, comfortable handling and button layout are vital. Size and ergonomics directly impact your creativity, as an inconvenient design can hamper spontaneous shooting.

Physical size and ergonomics comparison between Olympus VG-120 (left) and Samsung ST700 (right).

You'll notice from the size comparison that both cameras are pocket-friendly, but the Olympus VG-120 is a touch thinner at 19mm depth versus the Samsung ST700's 20mm. The VG-120 also weighs just 120 grams with battery and card, making it incredibly light - ideal for travel and street photography where discretion and mobility are priorities.

However, the Samsung ST700 has a slightly more extended grip area despite being narrower. This design may offer a more secure hold for users with larger hands. Meanwhile, VG-120’s minimalist build is elegant but can feel a bit slippery without a proper grip accessory.

In handling terms:

• Olympus VG-120: Superb for pure portability and casual carry; best if you prioritize minimalism.
• Samsung ST700: Slightly better grip, possibly more stable for extended shooting sessions.

Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, so your shooting experience depends heavily on the rear LCD.

Control Layout and User Interface: Smooth Operation in the Palm of Your Hand

If access to controls is clunky, it can lead to missed moments. Let’s compare the button placements and ease of navigation.

Top view design and control layout comparison.

Both cameras keep it simple, as expected in ultracompacts. The Olympus opts for a traditional shutter release surrounded by a zoom toggle, with a power button and small mode dial. With no manual focus or exposure controls, the VG-120 keeps things streamlined.

Samsung’s ST700, on the other hand, forgoes physical dials almost entirely, relying heavily on touchscreen input - a feature the VG-120 lacks. This touchscreen facilitates quicker menu navigation and exposure settings adjustments, especially for beginners comfortable with smartphone-like controls.

Key takeaway:

• VG-120: Physical buttons and dials suit users preferring tactile operation.
• ST700: Touchscreen makes the interface more intuitive but possibly slower when wearing gloves or in bright sunlight.

The lack of customizable buttons or advanced manual controls on either model limits their appeal for more serious photography but fits entry-level use well.

Sensor Specifications and Image Quality: The Heart of the Photography Experience

Sensor quality often makes or breaks picture quality. Here’s where microns matter most.

Sensor specifications and image quality discussion.

Both cameras feature 1/2.3" CCD sensors, typical for ultracompacts of their era. However, their sensor area and resolution differ:

The Samsung ST700's slightly larger sensor area and 16-megapixel count give it a slight theoretical edge in resolution. However, both cameras use CCD technology, which tends to introduce more noise in low-light situations compared to more modern CMOS sensors.

In our side-by-side tests, the extra resolution of the ST700 translates into a bit more detail in daylight conditions, but the Olympus’s TruePic III processor yields cleaner images, particularly at moderate ISO values. Neither offers RAW format capture, so post-processing flexibility is limited.

For portraits, landscape, and everyday snapshots, expect crisp daylight shots from both, with modest quality at ISO 400. Above ISO 800, noise becomes pronounced, lessening image clarity - even for small prints.

The Rear Display: Seeing and Composing Your Shots

A high-quality rear screen is essential for framing and reviewing images, especially in cameras without viewfinders.

LCD screen and interface comparison.

Both cameras sport 3-inch fixed TFT LCDs with 230k-dot resolution. The VG-120’s screen offers a neutral but bright display, with good visibility in shade but struggles under direct sunlight. The Samsung ST700’s screen with touchscreen responsiveness facilitates faster menu interaction.

While neither screen supports tilting or swiveling - a drawback for creative angles or selfies - the ST700’s touchscreen provides a slight convenience bonus for novice users.

Sample Gallery: Real-World Image Quality Side-by-Side

Let’s examine typical photos captured with both cameras during field tests.

Olympus VG 120 front Olympus VG 120 screen back Samsung ST700 front Samsung ST700 screen back

• Portraits: The Olympus VG-120 produced pleasantly smooth skin tones with accurate color rendition, aided by reasonable face detection. Samsung’s ST700 image had sharper detail but slightly cooler tones that might require post-editing correction.
• Macro: VG-120 impresses with a close focus distance of 7 cm, capturing fine details with decent sharpness. ST700’s macro performance was less nerve-fine, lacking a dedicated macro focus range.
• Landscapes: The ST700’s 16 MP resolution helps render more intricate cloud and leaf details, but Olympus’s color processing yields warmer, more natural colors.

In summary, Olympus VG-120 offers more pleasing color science and better macro prowess, while Samsung ST700 captures sharper overall detail thanks to higher sensor resolution.

Performance Metrics and User Ratings

To visualize strengths, let’s consider overall performance assessments based on extensive shooting feedback and comparison benchmarks.

• Image Quality: Samsung slightly ahead due to resolution
• Handling: Olympus favored for grip and simplicity
• Features: Samsung edges ahead with touchscreen and smarter UI
• Low Light: Both weak beyond ISO 800
• Video: Similar basic HD720p capabilities

Neither camera is a flagship performer, so pick according to shooting comfort and feature preference.

Specialty Photography: How They Fare Across Genres

Understanding how these ultracompacts cover diverse photography disciplines can clarify which suits your creative focus:

The lack of manual exposure controls, raw format, and advanced autofocus features limits their suitability for professional and advanced enthusiast work.

For casual snapshots, social sharing, and travel journaling, both cameras present viable options, with the slight advantage in macro and handling to the Olympus and easier menu navigation via touchscreen to Samsung.

Technical Deep Dive: Autofocus, Build, and Battery Life

• Autofocus: Both cameras rely on contrast-detection AF, which is inherently slower and less accurate than phase-detection systems. The Olympus uses face detection (improving portrait focus), while Samsung lacks this feature. Neither camera supports continuous tracking AF or manual focusing.

• Build Quality & Weather Resistance: Both models lack any weather sealing. Their plastic bodies feel adequately sturdy for everyday use, but treat them with care in harsh environments.

• Battery Life: The Olympus VG-120 uses the LI-70B battery rated for approximately 160 shots per charge - modest but adequate for light excursions. Samsung does not officially state battery life, but typical ultracompact units manage ~150-200 shots per charge. Neither supports USB charging or extended battery packs.

• Storage: Both employ a single SD/SDHC card slot - easy to find and affordable media types.

• Connectivity: No wireless features like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or GPS on either model. USB 2.0 is present on Olympus for basic data transfer; Samsung lacks a reported USB port. HDMI outputs are absent.

Video Capabilities: Basic, But Functional for Vlogging Starters

Video recording possibilities are limited but serviceable:

• Both shoot 720p videos at 30 frames per second, suitable for casual clip making.
• Video file compression uses Motion JPEG on Olympus - resulting in larger files with lower compression efficiency.
• Neither camera includes a microphone or headphone jack. Audio quality from the built-in mic is basic.
• Lack of image stabilization affects handheld shooting, increasing motion blur risk.

If video is a priority for you, modern smartphones or cameras with 1080p or 4K support and stabilization provide a far better experience. But these cameras can suffice for simple home videos or travel mementos.

Pricing and Value for Money in 2024

• Olympus VG-120: Approximately $190 new (though largely discontinued; often available used).
• Samsung ST700: Around $280 at launch, and similarly only obtainable used today.

Given their age and limitations, buying these cameras new is not practical. However, as affordable used ultracompacts - for example, to begin a photography hobby or as a lightweight second camera - they serve.

Considering value:

• Olympus offers better handling and pleasing color output at a lower cost.
• Samsung provides enhanced resolution and touchscreen convenience but at a higher price.

Recommendations: Which Camera Fits Your Needs?

Choose Olympus VG-120 if you want…

• An ultracompact that feels light and comfortable in the hand.
• Better macro photography capabilities with close focusing.
• More natural and warmer color rendition, especially for portraits.
• A budget-friendly entry camera that's simple in operation.

Choose Samsung ST700 if you want…

• Extra image resolution for detailed daylight shots.
• Touchscreen controls to quickly navigate menus and focus points.
• Slightly better grip for steady shooting.
• A compact with sharper image output for colorful landscapes.

Neither camera is ideal if you need:

• Manual exposure modes or RAW image output.
• Fast or continuous autofocus for action or wildlife.
• Good low light performance beyond ISO 800.
• Professional-grade video features or connectivity.

Final Words: A Vintage Snapshot of the Ultracompact Era

Both Olympus VG-120 and Samsung ST700 showcase the strengths and limitations typical of 2011-era ultracompacts. They prioritize portability and ease of use but compromise on advanced controls, speed, and low-light capabilities.

They still appeal for casual photography enthusiasts who value simple point-and-shoot operation, whether on street walks, short travels, or family gatherings. However, photographers seeking more creative control, modern sensor performance, or video prowess should look at newer offerings or mirrorless cameras.

If you find one of these models at a bargain price secondhand, it’s worth a try to get started. Pair it with a small tripod and some practice in daylight scenarios to unlock its potential. For ongoing creative growth, consider gradually upgrading to cameras that offer manual controls, raw support, and improved autofocus systems.

We hope this side-by-side comparison has clarified where each camera excels and helps you confidently match your next purchase to your photography goals.

Happy shooting!

All images included to assist visual comparison and better illustrate points made throughout this article.