Clicky

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Olympus VG-145 front
 
Ricoh CX2 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs

Olympus VG-145
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released July 2011
Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced August 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview

On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus VG-145 versus Ricoh CX2, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the VG-145 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The VG-145 was announced 24 months later than the CX2 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the VG-145 matches up versus the CX2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Ricoh CX2

 VG-145 CX2 
AnnouncedJuly 2011August 2009More recent by 24 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus VG-145

 CX2 VG-145 
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Ricoh CX2

 VG-145 CX2 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-145 comes with physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).

See the Olympus VG-145 versus Ricoh CX2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the VG-145 versus the CX2.

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-145 and CX2 is 96 and 93 respectively.

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-145 and CX2.

As you can see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus VG-145 to resolve more detail with its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern VG-145 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Portrait photography details
Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography details
33
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
features face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
25
has manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor resolution not great (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Street photography details
Ricoh CX2 Street photography details
48
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (185g)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Sports photography features
Ricoh CX2 Sports photography features
26
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
not so great battery (160 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution not great (9MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Travel photography details
Ricoh CX2 Travel photography details
62
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (160 per charge)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
66
lighter than competitors in class (185 grams)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
great reach (300mm)
sensor resolution not great (9MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VG-145
Landscape photography with Ricoh CX2
36
rather wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
not so great battery (160 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
42
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
sensor resolution not great (9 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh CX2 Vlogging highlights
28
rather wide (26mm)
features face detect focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic port
30
pretty wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (185 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-145 and Ricoh CX2
 Olympus VG-145Ricoh CX2
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VG-145 Ricoh CX2
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2011-07-27 2009-08-20
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28-300mm (10.7x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.40 m 3.00 m (ISO 400)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 120g (0.26 lb) 185g (0.41 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 160 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-70B DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $0 $341