Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus VG-145 versus Ricoh CX2, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the VG-145 (14MP) and CX2 (9MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VG-145 was announced 24 months later than the CX2 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the VG-145 matches up versus the CX2 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-145 & Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-145 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Ricoh CX2
VG-145 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | August 2009 | More recent by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus VG-145
CX2 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Ricoh CX2
VG-145 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-145 comes with physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
See the Olympus VG-145 versus Ricoh CX2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the VG-145 versus the CX2.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-145 and CX2 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-145 and CX2.
As you can see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus VG-145 to resolve more detail with its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern VG-145 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Olympus VG-145 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VG-145 | Ricoh CX2 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-07-27 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 120g (0.26 lb) | 185g (0.41 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-70B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $341 |