Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ae3/55ae31f75e84dab7b0db2166a0240eba322fda00" alt="Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d8e0/7d8e0c6ccb8d05257a2818cad25bd8279ac31704" alt="Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front"
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus VG-145 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is fairly well matched but the VG-145 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The VG-145 was unveiled 6 months prior to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the VG-145 matches up against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-145 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are available at Olympus VG-145 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
VG-145 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus VG-145
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
VG-145 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | February 2012 | Similar age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-145 has got exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VG-145 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the VG-145 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/834ee/834ee781013da887760bbfbce6b179fb55439dd5" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the VG-145 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 96 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fa1d/7fa1d581993588c69098aa101dab178f7e154679" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-145 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can see, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VG-145 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b96da/b96da0166361960a5da9f0d5d0ebebd311961b36" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29a09/29a0905e41e279b0c03ec6af80863cb41fa33aa2" alt="Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Olympus VG-145 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VG-145 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.40 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 120 grams (0.26 lb) | 550 grams (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 images | 400 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $871 |