Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Released September 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the VG-145 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VG-145 was manufactured 11 months after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the VG-145 grades versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-145 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-145 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
| VG-145 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2011 | September 2010 | More modern by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus VG-145
| GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
| VG-145 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-145 offers physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the VG-145 vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-145 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 96 and 88 respectively.
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specifications. The pic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-145 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VG-145 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus VG-145 will resolve more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher VG-145 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VG-145 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
| Olympus VG-145 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-145 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2010-09-21 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | GR Engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120g (0.26 lbs) | 140g (0.31 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 photographs | 320 photographs |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $566 |