Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240
96 Imaging
36 Features
24 Overall
31
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternative Name is ST5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VG-145 was launched 19 months after the TL240 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the VG-145 scores versus the TL240 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-145 & Samsung TL240. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VG-145 Gallery & Samsung TL240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Samsung TL240
| VG-145 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 | January 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Olympus VG-145
| TL240 | VG-145 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung TL240
| VG-145 | TL240 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-145 offers outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the VG-145 and the TL240.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-145 and TL240 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-145 and TL240.
As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you can expect similar quality of files though you will need to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more recent VG-145 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications
| Olympus VG-145 | Samsung TL240 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VG-145 | Samsung TL240 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST5000 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2011-07-27 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 120g (0.26 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 160 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $171 |