Clicky

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240

Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31
Olympus VG-145 front
 
Samsung TL240 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
32
Overall
34

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Key Specs

Olympus VG-145
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released July 2011
Samsung TL240
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Introduced January 2010
  • Alternative Name is ST5000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the TL240 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The VG-145 was launched 19 months after the TL240 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the VG-145 scores versus the TL240 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Samsung TL240

 VG-145 TL240 
IntroducedJuly 2011January 2010More modern by 19 months

Reasons to pick Samsung TL240 over the Olympus VG-145

 TL240 VG-145 
Screen sizing3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung TL240

 VG-145 TL240 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-145 offers outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) while the Samsung TL240 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the VG-145 and the TL240.

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-145 and TL240 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-145 and TL240.

As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you can expect similar quality of files though you will need to take the launch date of the products into consideration. The more recent VG-145 will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Portrait photography details
Samsung TL240 Portrait photography details
33
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
28
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Street photography factors
Samsung TL240 Street photography factors
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
60
image stabilization (Optical)
includes touch focus
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (160g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-145 Sports photography info
Samsung TL240 Sports photography info
26
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (160 CIPA)
lacks phase detect auto focus
43
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-145 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL240 as a Travel photography camera
62
megapixel count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
bad battery power (160 CIPA)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
60
includes touch focus
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (160g)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-145 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung TL240 as a Landscape photography camera
36
pretty wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not available
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
bad battery power (160 shots)
lack of Time Lapse function
37
bigger than average screen (3.5 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VG-145
Vlogging with Samsung TL240
28
pretty wide (26mm)
includes face detect focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic support
27
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (160g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL240 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-145 and Samsung TL240
 Olympus VG-145Samsung TL240
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus VG-145 Samsung TL240
Also referred to as - ST5000
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Released 2011-07-27 2010-01-06
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 4334 x 3256
Maximum native ISO 1600 4800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3.5 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.40 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 120g (0.26 pounds) 160g (0.35 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 160 images -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-70B SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $0 $171