Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
![Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VG-145/Olympus-VG-145-front.jpg)
![Samsung TL320 front Samsung TL320 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-TL320.jpg)
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Launched February 2009
- Other Name is WB1000
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VG-145 (14MP) and the TL320 (12MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The VG-145 was released 2 years later than the TL320 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the VG-145 grades vs the TL320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-145 & Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-145 Gallery & Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Samsung TL320
VG-145 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Olympus VG-145
TL320 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-145 and Samsung TL320
VG-145 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-145 has physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL320 has sizing of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the VG-145 and the TL320.
![Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VG-145-vs-Samsung-TL320-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-145 and TL320 is 96 and 98 respectively.
![Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VG-145-vs-Samsung-TL320-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-145 and TL320.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-145 to deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher VG-145 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
![Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-VG-145-vs-Samsung-TL320-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VG-145-vs-Samsung-TL320-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VG-145 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Olympus VG-145 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus VG-145 | Samsung TL320 |
Also Known as | - | WB1000 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-07-27 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.40 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 120g (0.26 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $0 | $380 |