Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX78
Portability
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Panasonic FX78
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX78, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the FX78 (12MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VG-160 was unveiled 12 months after the FX78 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a simple overview of how the VG-160 grades vs the FX78 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-160 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The full galleries are available at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Panasonic FX78
| VG-160 | FX78 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus VG-160
| FX78 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic FX78
| VG-160 | FX78 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 offers outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Panasonic FX78 has specifications of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX78 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the VG-160 versus the FX78.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and FX78 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The image below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and FX78.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VG-160 to show more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern VG-160 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus VG-160 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FX78 as a Portrait photography camera
good MP (14 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus VG-160
Street photography with Panasonic FX78
lighter than competitors (125g)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Olympus VG-160 Sports photography factors
Panasonic FX78 Sports photography factors
good MP (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (165 shots)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking focus
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (200 per charge)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus VG-160 Travel photography information
Panasonic FX78 Travel photography information
lighter than competitors (125 grams)
good MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
terrible battery power (165 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
bad battery pack (200 per charge)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FX78 Landscape photography factors
relatively wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
good MP (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
terrible battery power (165 shots)
does not have Timelapse recording
decently wide (24mm)
screen larger than average (3.5 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
bad battery pack (200 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-160 Vlogging advice
Panasonic FX78 Vlogging advice
relatively wide (26mm)
supports face detect focus
lighter than competitors (125g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone port
decently wide (24mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2011-01-25 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 142 gr (0.31 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 shots | 200 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $90 | $210 |