Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS3
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
91 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched May 2009
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ7
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and ZS3 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-160 was revealed 2 years later than the ZS3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the VG-160 scores versus the ZS3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Panasonic ZS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Panasonic ZS3
| VG-160 | ZS3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | May 2009 | More recent by 33 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Olympus VG-160
| ZS3 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Panasonic ZS3
| VG-160 | ZS3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 enjoys external measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS3 has sizing of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the VG-160 compared to the ZS3.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and ZS3 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by checking specifications. The visual below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and ZS3.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus VG-160 to give greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer VG-160 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus VG-160 vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ7 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 229g (0.50 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $90 | $200 |