Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is relatively similar but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.

The VG-160 was introduced 2 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the VG-160 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-160 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
VG-160 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | November 2009 | More recent by 27 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus VG-160
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
VG-160 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 has outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the VG-160 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 96 and 77 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by reviewing technical specs. The visual below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VG-160 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus VG-160 will deliver more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher VG-160 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 pictures | 320 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $90 | $566 |