Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
84 Imaging
52 Features
39 Overall
46
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced August 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is relatively similar but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-160 was manufactured 6 months after the GXR Mount A12 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the VG-160 matches up against the GXR Mount A12 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
| VG-160 | GXR Mount A12 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus VG-160
| GXR Mount A12 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
| VG-160 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 | August 2011 | Similar generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 provides outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has specifications of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the VG-160 compared to the GXR Mount A12.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and GXR Mount A12 is 96 and 84 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and GXR Mount A12.
As you can see, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The VG-160 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Olympus VG-160 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2011-08-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | () |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/9000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 9.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 370 gr (0.82 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $90 | $349 |