Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh PX

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Ricoh PX front
Portability
95
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2012
Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Launched August 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh PX Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh PX, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the PX (16MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The VG-160 was announced 5 months after the PX so they are of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the VG-160 grades vs the PX in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh PX

 VG-160 PX 
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus VG-160

 PX VG-160 
Manual focus Very precise focus

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh PX

 VG-160 PX 
LaunchedJanuary 2012August 2011Similar age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 features physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh PX in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the VG-160 versus the PX.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh PX size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and PX is 96 and 95 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The pic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and PX.

As you can see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh PX to resolve greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography info
Ricoh PX Portrait photography info
33
decent MP (14MP)
has face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
42
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
offers face detect autofocus
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh PX as a Street photography camera
56
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Sports photography factors
Ricoh PX Sports photography factors
26
decent MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery power (165 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
weather proofing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VG-160
Travel photography with Ricoh PX
65
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
bad battery power (165 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
68
weather proofing
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh PX Landscape photography highlights
36
reasonably wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
bad battery power (165 per charge)
lack of Timelapse mode
47
focusing manually
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
weather proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Vlogging info
Ricoh PX Vlogging info
30
reasonably wide (26mm)
has face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (125g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone port
31
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone port
Photography Glossary

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh PX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh PX
 Olympus VG-160Ricoh PX
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus VG-160 Ricoh PX
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2012-01-10 2011-08-16
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3072
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.9-5.4
Macro focus range 7cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.80 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lbs) 156 gr (0.34 lbs)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 165 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-70B DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $90 $329