Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32


90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Refreshed by Ricoh WG-6

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The VG-160 was released 4 years before the WG-5 GPS which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the VG-160 scores versus the WG-5 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
VG-160 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus VG-160
WG-5 GPS | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2012 | Newer by 37 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
VG-160 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 offers outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VG-160 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the VG-160 compared to the WG-5 GPS.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and WG-5 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and WG-5 GPS.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to give greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VG-160 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 236 gr (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 pictures | 240 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $90 | $500 |