Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67f84/67f84ba37112e0b724a4e30ca9f4099db427b4f9" alt="Samsung GX-1S front Samsung GX-1S front"
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Revealed January 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The VG-160 was launched 6 years after the GX-1S which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the VG-160 scores vs the GX-1S for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 and Samsung GX-1S. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung GX-1S
VG-160 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2006 | Newer by 73 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus VG-160
GX-1S | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung GX-1S
VG-160 | GX-1S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1S has proportions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the VG-160 vs the GX-1S.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abd2f/abd2fa8be3a995de05dafa05db1f4c328d69cad5" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and GX-1S is 96 and 68 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31c57/31c57c92473229b49ba3260570d629b69adac51d" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The picture underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and GX-1S.
As you have seen, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The VG-160 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus VG-160 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer VG-160 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d6df/5d6dfdb0e7da2a042a0694022590a581f98d1da9" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1586/e1586114ad67dc4a4d79f101ab500ae110a021bf" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Samsung GX-1S | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Samsung GX-1S |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2006-01-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 605 gr (1.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-70B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $90 | $850 |