Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL500
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Announced July 2010
- Additionally referred to as EX1
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung TL500, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") use different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VG-160 was launched 19 months after the TL500 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the VG-160 scores vs the TL500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 & Samsung TL500. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung TL500
| VG-160 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Olympus VG-160
| TL500 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung TL500
| VG-160 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 enjoys physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has sizing of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung TL500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the VG-160 vs the TL500.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and TL500 is 96 and 88 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and TL500.
All in all, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The VG-160 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus VG-160 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher VG-160 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Samsung TL500 |
| Otherwise known as | - | EX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2010-07-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 386 grams (0.85 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photographs | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $90 | $527 |