Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty similar and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VG-160 was announced 12 months earlier than the WB800F which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the VG-160 scores against the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-160 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung WB800F
| VG-160 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus VG-160
| WB800F | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2012 | Newer by 12 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung WB800F
| VG-160 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 has exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the VG-160 and the WB800F.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The image below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and WB800F.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB800F to deliver more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $90 | $300 |