Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
26
Overall
33
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2012
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is pretty similar and they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The VG-160 was announced 12 months earlier than the WB800F which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the VG-160 scores against the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung WB800F

 VG-160 WB800F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus VG-160

 WB800F VG-160 
IntroducedJanuary 2013January 2012Newer by 12 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung WB800F

 VG-160 WB800F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 has exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the VG-160 and the WB800F.

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing technical specs. The image below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and WB800F.

As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung WB800F to deliver more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography information
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography information
34
good resolution (14 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
44
you can focus manually
decent MP (16MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB800F as a Street photography camera
56
lighter than competition (125 grams)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (218 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Sports photography information
Samsung WB800F Sports photography information
27
good resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (165 shots)
lacks phase detect auto focus
53
incredible zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Travel photography features
Samsung WB800F Travel photography features
66
lighter than competition (125g)
good resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse mode
not so great battery (165 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than average in class (218g)
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
missing Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography advice
37
relatively wide (26mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
not so great battery (165 per charge)
no Time Lapse mode
50
you can focus manually
rather wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB800F Vlogging highlights
30
relatively wide (26mm)
supports face detect focus
lighter than competition (125 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no mic socket
35
rather wide (23mm)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (218g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Samsung WB800F
 Olympus VG-160Samsung WB800F
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus VG-160 Samsung WB800F
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2012-01-10 2013-01-07
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT Color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.80 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 grams (0.28 pounds) 218 grams (0.48 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 165 pictures -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-70B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $90 $300