Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W230

Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
26
Overall
33
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
25
Overall
31

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W230 Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Sony W230
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
  • 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Revealed February 2009
Photography Glossary

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W230 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Olympus VG-160 versus Sony W230, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the W230 (12MP) is very well matched and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The VG-160 was manufactured 2 years later than the W230 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the VG-160 matches up versus the W230 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony W230

 VG-160 W230 
RevealedJanuary 2012February 2009More recent by 36 months

Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Olympus VG-160

 W230 VG-160 
Manually focus Very exact focusing

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony W230

 VG-160 W230 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison

If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 enjoys outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony W230 has proportions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Check out the Olympus VG-160 versus Sony W230 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the VG-160 and the W230.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W230 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and W230 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W230 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements just by checking specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and W230.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Olympus VG-160 to give you more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern VG-160 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W230 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W230 as a Portrait photography camera
34
good MP (14MP)
provides face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
27
focusing manually
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Street photography highlights
Sony W230 Street photography highlights
56
lighter than others (125 grams)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Sports photography factors
Sony W230 Sports photography factors
27
good MP (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery pack (165 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Travel photography factors
Sony W230 Travel photography factors
66
lighter than others (125g)
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (26mm)
no Timelapse mode
bad battery pack (165 per charge)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
51
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography information
Sony W230 Landscape photography information
37
quite wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
good MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
bad battery pack (165 shots)
no Timelapse mode
37
focusing manually
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Vlogging details
Sony W230 Vlogging details
30
quite wide (26mm)
provides face detect focus
lighter than others (125 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no microphone socket
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
no mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony W230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Sony W230
 Olympus VG-160Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VG-160 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2012-01-10 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 30-120mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/2.8-5.8
Macro focus distance 7cm 4cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.80 m 3.90 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 lbs) 156 grams (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 165 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-70B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $90 $180