Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the VH-410 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the VH-410 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The VH-410 was announced 3 months earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the VH-410 matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-410 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-410 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
VH-410 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus VH-410
XZ-2 iHS | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
VH-410 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2012 | ![]() | December 2012 | Similar generation |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VH-410 features external measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has specifications of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the VH-410 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a2c2/1a2c25bdf8c20a1def94f070203e18389e8583c5" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VH-410 and XZ-2 iHS is 95 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d111/4d111270577035664d6fe4b4c53ad613d4bdc5c2" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through a spec sheet. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-410 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VH-410 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus VH-410 will give you more detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de99a/de99afa158323138bf7fcaeb1892bee7bd44b87f" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b680/4b680627870189614a80d1e5d328f4bbc594e66d" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus VH-410 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus VH-410 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-08-21 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $186 | $450 |