Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74efc/74efc246825aff5ab2faab7c06cfeb0ab333069a" alt="Ricoh G900 front Ricoh G900 front"
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Announced February 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus VH-410 versus Ricoh G900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VH-410 (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The VH-410 was introduced 6 years before the G900 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the VH-410 grades against the G900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VH-410 & Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VH-410 Gallery & Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Ricoh G900
VH-410 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus VH-410
G900 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2012 | More modern by 67 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Ricoh G900
VH-410 | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VH-410 comes with external dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus VH-410 versus Ricoh G900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the VH-410 compared to the G900.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80298/8029836ca92d23ea41a733b904ec021aeb1b2b5f" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VH-410 and G900 is 95 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdbf4/cdbf469aa26eece5c7848e2e38eb2809bd60900b" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes just by looking at specifications. The pic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-410 and G900.
To sum up, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh G900 to resolve extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged VH-410 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6bc1/f6bc11518827ea601f57f2163abafe26fed888d2" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4389a/4389ad1c78489c27f75a625ca816c1542f5caf97" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Olympus VH-410 | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus VH-410 | Ricoh G900 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2012-08-21 | 2018-02-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $186 | $752 |