Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
![Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-VH-410/Olympus-VH-410-front.jpg)
![Samsung HZ35W front Samsung HZ35W front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-HZ35W.jpg)
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus VH-410 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the VH-410 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The VH-410 was launched 2 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the VH-410 matches up versus the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VH-410 & Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VH-410 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Samsung HZ35W
VH-410 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | ![]() | June 2010 | Newer by 27 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus VH-410
HZ35W | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Samsung HZ35W
VH-410 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VH-410 has outer measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus VH-410 versus Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the VH-410 vs the HZ35W.
![Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VH-410-vs-Samsung-HZ35W-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VH-410 and HZ35W is 95 and 91 respectively.
![Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VH-410-vs-Samsung-HZ35W-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VH-410 and HZ35W.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus VH-410 to render more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer VH-410 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
![Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-VH-410-vs-Samsung-HZ35W-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-VH-410-vs-Samsung-HZ35W-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus VH-410 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus VH-410 | Samsung HZ35W |
Also called as | - | WB650 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-08-21 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $186 | $300 |