Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus VH-410 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the VH-410 (16MP) and HZ35W (12MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VH-410 was launched 2 years after the HZ35W which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the VH-410 matches up versus the HZ35W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VH-410 & Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VH-410 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Samsung HZ35W
| VH-410 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 27 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus VH-410
| HZ35W | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Samsung HZ35W
| VH-410 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VH-410 has outer measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus VH-410 versus Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the VH-410 vs the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VH-410 and HZ35W is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VH-410 and HZ35W.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus VH-410 to render more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer VH-410 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus VH-410 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VH-410 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-08-21 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $186 | $300 |