Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Later Model is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the VH-515 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is pretty similar but the VH-515 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VH-515 was introduced 3 years later than the GR Digital III and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the VH-515 scores against the GR Digital III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VH-515 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VH-515 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| VH-515 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2012 | July 2009 | More recent by 38 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus VH-515
| GR Digital III | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh GR Digital III
| VH-515 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VH-515 provides exterior measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh GR Digital III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the VH-515 and the GR Digital III.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VH-515 and GR Digital III is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The graphic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-515 and GR Digital III.
To sum up, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The VH-515 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus VH-515 will offer extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more modern VH-515 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
| Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-08-21 | 2009-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $648 | $399 |