Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ce5/77ce56bcec511e7aab885ff155154eb3bca39025" alt="Olympus VH-515 front Olympus VH-515 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70455/70455b470de7a381df26b21e53c60bdd7569f00d" alt="Samsung WB350F front Samsung WB350F front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
- Released January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung WB350F, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the VH-515 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The VH-515 was launched 16 months before the WB350F which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the VH-515 scores vs the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-515 and Samsung WB350F. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VH-515 Gallery and Samsung WB350F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Samsung WB350F
VH-515 | WB350F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus VH-515
WB350F | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2012 | Newer by 16 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung WB350F
VH-515 | WB350F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VH-515 features physical measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has measurements of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung WB350F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the VH-515 compared to the WB350F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eac17/eac178a17666ee65107c847ec2a59f02ef35e8b2" alt="Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VH-515 and WB350F is 95 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22ddc/22ddcc2a0676e3087ddc463127772778fd6582c3" alt="Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specifications. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-515 and WB350F.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB350F to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged VH-515 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c05bb/c05bb3813e41e0ee1c4bb1cc7237694838b95f26" alt="Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison"
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2694/f2694abe6839669207030aac266d4b6390d07546" alt="Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications
Olympus VH-515 | Samsung WB350F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung WB350F |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-08-21 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 276 gr (0.61 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50B | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $648 | $260 |