Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad185/ad185b01cdac3623bd83655117714be9dc2783ff" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 front Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 front"
62 Imaging
60 Features
90 Overall
72
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 658g - 137 x 97 x 92mm
- Launched November 2017
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and G9 (20MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and G9 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The VR-320 was brought out 7 years prior to the G9 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the VR-320 grades versus the G9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic Lumix DC-G9. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Panasonic G9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic G9
VR-320 | G9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G9 over the Olympus VR-320
G9 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2017 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 76 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic G9
VR-320 | G9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 features outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic G9 has specifications of 137mm x 97mm x 92mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 658 grams (1.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the VR-320 and the G9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05250/052503860efb2bc4ccc57040f7554a4426cf6eff" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and G9 is 94 and 62 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/701bf/701bf0195e5045d267699e6ba2e9c0b212e5adf5" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VR-320 and G9.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Panasonic G9 will render extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1483/e148302961a445e9c084bb7a94d6a6aef188ddea" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bd7c/3bd7cb96abf4b7b6b8878c8bb116b190e231e6cd" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G9 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2017-11-08 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,680 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.83x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 658 grams (1.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 137 x 97 x 92mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | DMW-BLF19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | One | Dual |
Price at launch | $179 | $1,500 |