Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FP2
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
95 Imaging
36 Features
17 Overall
28
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FP2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FP2 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic FP2, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the FP2 (14MP) is pretty close and they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VR-320 was manufactured 19 months after the FP2 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FP2 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the VR-320 matches up versus the FP2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FP2 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Panasonic FP2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic FP2
| VR-320 | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP2 over the Olympus VR-320
| FP2 | VR-320 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic FP2
| VR-320 | FP2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FP2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 has exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic FP2 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic FP2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the VR-320 against the FP2.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and FP2 is 94 and 95 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FP2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching a spec sheet. The image underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and FP2.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution and you can expect comparable quality of images however you really should consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer VR-320 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FP2 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FP2 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP2 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) | 151 gr (0.33 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $179 | $80 |