Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Renewed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Launched April 2019
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-G90
- Superseded the Panasonic G85
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VR-320 was brought out 8 years prior to the G95 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the VR-320 scores against the G95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic G95
VR-320 | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus VR-320
G95 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2019 | July 2011 | Fresher by 93 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic G95
VR-320 | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 has outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic G95 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 vs the G95.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and G95 is 94 and 67 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The photograph below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and G95.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VR-320 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Panasonic G95 will render more detail having its extra 6.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older VR-320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2019-04-05 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20.3 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 536g (1.18 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $179 | $998 |