Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 front
Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
88
Overall
72

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
  • Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Panasonic G95
(Full Review)
  • 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
  • Launched April 2019
  • Also Known as Lumix DMC-G90
  • Superseded the Panasonic G85
Photography Glossary

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and G95 (20.3MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and G95 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VR-320 was brought out 8 years prior to the G95 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the VR-320 scores against the G95 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic G95

 VR-320 G95 

Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Olympus VR-320

 G95 VR-320 
LaunchedApril 2019July 2011Fresher by 93 months
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1240k230kSharper screen (+1010k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic G95

 VR-320 G95 
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 has outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic G95 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 vs the G95.

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and G95 is 94 and 67 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching specs. The photograph below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and G95.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VR-320 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Panasonic G95 will render more detail having its extra 6.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older VR-320 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Portrait photography details
Panasonic G95 Portrait photography details
33
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
77
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (20.3MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
exports RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Street photography information
Panasonic G95 Street photography information
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
provides focus by touch
weather sealing
good ISO range (25,600)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Sports photography features
Panasonic G95 Sports photography features
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
68
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20.3 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather sealing
terrible battery power (290 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Travel photography information
Panasonic G95 Travel photography information
70
lighter than competitors in class (158g)
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
73
weather sealing
has bluetooth
provides focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (20.3MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
terrible battery power (290 CIPA)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VR-320
Landscape photography with Panasonic G95
42
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
no manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
76
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20.3 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather sealing
terrible battery power (290 shots)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Vlogging details
Panasonic G95 Vlogging details
32
relatively wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
lighter than competitors in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
79
selfie friendly screen
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does have microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic G95
 Olympus VR-320Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus VR-320 Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95
Also referred to as - Lumix DMC-G90
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2011-07-19 2019-04-05
Body design Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III Venus Engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 20.3 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 80 200
RAW format
Lowest boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 49
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Available lenses - 107
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,240k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 6.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 158g (0.35 pounds) 536g (1.18 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 290 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported)
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $179 $998