Clicky

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1

Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36
Olympus VR-320 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front
Portability
85
Imaging
47
Features
47
Overall
47

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs

Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Replacement is Olympus VR-330
Panasonic GF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
  • Released October 2009
  • Newer Model is Panasonic GF2
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Overview

Its time to look closer at the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the GF1 (12MP) is very close but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GF1 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The VR-320 was launched 22 months later than the GF1 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the VR-320 scores against the GF1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic GF1

 VR-320 GF1 
ReleasedJuly 2011October 2009More recent by 22 months

Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Olympus VR-320

 GF1 VR-320 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic GF1

 VR-320 GF1 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 comes with external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF1 has sizing of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).

Check the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the VR-320 versus the GF1.

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and GF1 is 94 and 85 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through specs. The visual below will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and GF1.

All in all, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VR-320 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Olympus VR-320 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher VR-320 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic GF1 as a Portrait photography camera
33
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
features face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
60
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VR-320
Street photography with Panasonic GF1
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (158g)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
64
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic GF1 as a Sports photography camera
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
44
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
great battery power (380 shots)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic GF1 as a Travel photography camera
70
lighter than others in class (158g)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
59
great battery power (380 per charge)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography information
Panasonic GF1 Landscape photography information
42
pretty wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
does not have Timelapse recording
60
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
great battery power (380 per charge)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
lack of Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic GF1 as a Vlogging camera
32
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
25
offers face detection autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic GF1
 Olympus VR-320Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus VR-320 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2011-07-19 2009-10-14
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III Venus Engine HD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 23
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Highest aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 107
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech TFT Color LCD TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.70 m 6.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG AVCHD Lite
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 158 gr (0.35 pounds) 385 gr (0.85 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 54
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.2
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.3
DXO Low light score not tested 513
Other
Battery life - 380 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model LI-42B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images))
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/MMC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $179 $400