Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GX850
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
90 Imaging
55 Features
70 Overall
61
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Introduced January 2017
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic GX850, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the GX850 (16MP) is relatively similar but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GX850 (Four Thirds) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VR-320 was brought out 6 years before the GX850 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GX850 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the VR-320 scores versus the GX850 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Panasonic GX850 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic GX850
VR-320 | GX850 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX850 over the Olympus VR-320
GX850 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2017 | July 2011 | Fresher by 66 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic GX850
VR-320 | GX850 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 enjoys physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GX850 has specifications of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic GX850 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the VR-320 versus the GX850.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and GX850 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and GX850.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VR-320 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Panasonic GX850 will offer you more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older VR-320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GX850 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX850 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-GX800 / Lumix DMC-GF9 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2017-01-04 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3448 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 20 Mbps, MP4, H.264 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 269 gr (0.59 lb) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 586 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 sec, 3 images/10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | microSD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $179 | $548 |