Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K-S2
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
64 Imaging
64 Features
82 Overall
71
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K-S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 678g - 123 x 91 x 73mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Pentax K-S1
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K-S2 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax K-S2, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and K-S2 (20MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and K-S2 (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VR-320 was introduced 4 years prior to the K-S2 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-S2 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the VR-320 grades versus the K-S2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K-S2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Pentax K-S2. The whole galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Pentax K-S2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Pentax K-S2
VR-320 | K-S2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S2 over the Olympus VR-320
K-S2 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2015 | July 2011 | More modern by 43 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Pentax K-S2
VR-320 | K-S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K-S2 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 comes with physical dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Pentax K-S2 has measurements of 123mm x 91mm x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VR-320 versus Pentax K-S2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the VR-320 compared to the K-S2.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and K-S2 is 94 and 64 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K-S2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and K-S2.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VR-320 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Pentax K-S2 will give you greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K-S2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Pentax K-S2 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Pentax K-S2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Pentax K-S2 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2015-02-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.4 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 lb) | 678 gr (1.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 123 x 91 x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $179 | $581 |